That sounds like a case for a more descriptive name, rather than a case for hiding something. In the past, users had used the Delete action and only later realised that whole notes were gone. The people on this forum are not representative of the average user. I think the above advice holds for users of tools like Anki as well as programming languages. It is the working computer user’s bread and butter.Īttention to beginners is considered important, because most computer programmers will always be such, and because many beginners never widen their knowledge, limiting themselves to work in aspects of the language in which they specialize. Right-clicking on stuff, on the other hand, is universal, foolproof, and really only requires you to be able to read the options presented. The toolbar suffers from a similar problem, in that there is not a toolbar for every GUI program, and for the ones that do have them, each one is arranged differently. While certainly many folks do, I think beginners and less computer-literate users are unlikely to get much use out of these. Three of your proposed alternatives require the user to know keyboard shortcuts. Your justification for making something difficult to use is “use something else”? Why not just get rid of it then? This is what OP asked for, and it’s what I believe would be very useful to have for my special snowflake case as well. whole notes) would be an acceptable workaround though. But this is added complexity for an arguably extremely fringe edge case, so I’m not advocating for its inclusion or consideration.Īn option to manually delete undesired cards (vs. I imagine a new field option to specify a field as permissible, i.e., its placement in a template shouldn’t influence card creation, would solve this particular issue. Temporarily clearing the “geo” field and running the Empty Cards command does find and delete them, but Anki adds them back empty as soon as I re-populate the “geo” field. Tools > Empty Cards doesn’t help here it won’t recognize the empty cards because they are not technically empty due to the “geo” field. However, in my case (and I imagine there are more than just this one), it calls for an option to delete such cards that are now “empty” manually. It’s perfectly logical to keep cards around if at least one of the fields shown in the template is filled. So this is not a bug in Anki, but rather a quirk, or at least a special edge case. However, in notes that have the “geo” field filled, Anki always creates 5 cards for all synonym fields, regardless of them being filled or empty, because all front-side templates contain that field. Some may just have one, others two, and most don’t have any. Not all cards have three synonyms, of course. All front-side templates include the “geo” field at the bottom. Each one of these three additional fields yields a separate card. Then I have a field for the primary word, and one for the translation, plus up to three more for synonyms. I’ve set my front-side template to show this geo field in small gray text at the bottom. That also contains another field which remains filled in the note.Įxample: a language learning deck for Spanish with a field “geo”, which may contain something like “Latam” or “Iberia” or “Colombia” or “Mexico, Centram, Uruguay”. In my case, that’s because Anki doesn’t consider the cards to be empty: the front-side template contains more than just the now-empty field. When I later change the note and remove the contents of (some of) those fields, the cards remain in place, but are now empty. I have a note template that creates multiple cards from certain fields (up to 5 total per note). I don’t have a solution, only a workaround, but it’s for my specific use case and may not apply to everyone. abdo’s answer only addresses how to delete a whole note. I have the same problem - I can’t delete a card.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |